Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamalpur Fake Encounter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. (non-admin closure) czar ♔ 21:02, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jamalpur Fake Encounter

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia is WP:NOTNEWS. The incident is yet not notable enough to have a WP article. The title also violates WP:NPOV. Vigyani_talk^{ਯੋਗਦਾਨ} 05:25, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This has been reported for five days and will likely continue to be covered, so it is probably not deletable under WP:109PAPERS. The newspapers referenced have substantially different contents and are adequate for WP:GNG. I changed the template to "Current" from "Under Construction." --Sammy1339 (talk) 04:52, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:17, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:18, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:18, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:18, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep|No Delete: The incident has shaken Punjab Government. (various news report). Wiki is not news, agree but Encounter itself which involve politicians and in which SSP/SHO/Homegaurds etc. are suspended, in which parties like AAP, Congress actively participating, For this special Special investigation team also been set, provides enough to mark it notable. It is similar to other encounter articles on wikipedia like 2009 Dehradun Encounter, Rahul Raj encounter, Tulsiram Prajapati Killing etc. It should remain under construction till final results comes out. Title can be change to Ludhiana Fake Encounter or something else? (Karantsingh (talk) 12:13, 4 October 2014 (UTC))[reply]
We have to wait. I would be nominating every encounter article for deletion, but the guideline of notability allows having these articles. Until now I regarded it as Ludhiana Fake encounter killings, but we can talk about title sometime later. Bladesmulti (talk) 07:56, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The article is renamed to 2014 Jamalpur Encounter. Though Jamalpur is small area in Ludhiana. It can be named as 2014 Ludhiana Encounter but May be in future more encounters occur in Ludhiana or more articles comes from Past so giving it an area name and describing about area in article will be better approach. (Karantsingh (talk) 03:56, 7 October 2014 (UTC))[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:19, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - not deletable under WP:109PAPERS.--BabbaQ (talk) 11:14, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes WP:GNG and as for WP:LASTING.It may take weeks or months to determine whether or not an event has a lasting effect. This does not, however, mean recent events with unproven lasting effect are automatically non-notable.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 14:24, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.